ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026
Identifying Key Correlates of Problem Sports Betting in Young Adults: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Problem sports betting is an increasing public health concern, especially among young adults who are developmentally vulnerable to gambling-related harm. Although past studies have identified correlates of sports betting harm, most have not accounted for the potential influence of wide ranges of other variables in multivariable models. This study applied machine learning to identify the most influential predictors of problem sports betting in a sample of 221 young adults (ages 18–29; 77% male) from 35 U.S. states who reported recent engagement in sports betting. Two machine learning algorithms, regularized regression and random forest, were used to predict scores on the Problem Gambling Severity Index–Sports Betting (PGSI-SB) from a broad set of 80 candidate predictors. Nested cross-validation was used to tune model parameters and obtain unbiased out-of-sample performance estimates in this modest sample. The regularized regression model reduced out-of-sample prediction error by 39% relative to a naïve baseline model, whereas the random forest reduced error by 34%. Across both models, sports betting motives, social functioning, amount wagered, and perceived harm from sports betting emerged as the most influential predictors. Given that both models left considerable prediction error unexplained, it is likely that important determinants of problem sports betting were not captured in the available feature set. Findings demonstrate the utility of machine learning in identifying key risk factors across multiple domains and highlight the importance of focusing on sports betting motives and social functioning in prevention efforts. This study contributes to a growing evidence base by identifying factors that are uniquely predictive of problem sports betting among young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41652208What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.