Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652168›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026

Computational and Experimental Approaches and Applications of Biological NMR.

Annalisa Pastore, Piero Andrea Temussi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annalisa PastoreDementia Research Institute at King's College London, The Wohl Institute, London, UK. annalisa.1.pastore@kcl.ac.uk.
Piero Andrea TemussiUniversita' di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter is dedicated to analysing how biological nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has evolved in the more than 70 years from its discovery and to discussing some of the applications of this technique to biological systems. To restrict a vast field, we treat liquid-state NMR leaving out solid-state applications that, although very important, are less consolidated and still fast evolving. We focus in particular on studies in complex environments, such as in-cell and/or crowded environments, that is a subject in which NMR can give its very best. We provide examples of various applications and hopefully show how versatile the technique is. We also briefly discuss how NMR can be coupled with other techniques to expand its horizons, increasing the intrinsic potentialities of this powerful technique.

Indexed as

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProteinsAnimalsHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProtein ConformationProteinsBiological NMRBiophysicsProteinsSpectroscopyStructure determination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.