Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652161›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026

Enhanced Sampling and Free Energy Calculations in Protein Simulations.

Carmen Domene, Simone Furini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carmen DomeneDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK. mcdn20@bath.ac.u.
Simone FuriniDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering 'Guglielmo Marconi', University of Bologna, Cesena, FC, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free energy calculations play a vital role in understanding protein behaviour at the molecular level. From protein folding and stability to ligand binding and enzyme catalysis, these calculations provide quantitative insights that are indispensable for both basic research and practical applications in fields such as drug discovery, protein engineering, and biotechnology. Due to the complex energy landscapes of proteins, traditional molecular dynamics simulations often fail to explore rare events or overcome high-energy barriers effectively. Enhanced sampling techniques, such as metadynamics, umbrella sampling, or replica exchange molecular dynamics, were developed to address these challenges, allowing for more efficient exploration of conformational space and improved accuracy in free energy predictions. These methods accelerate the sampling of relevant states and transitions, making it feasible to capture rare but biologically significant events. Recently, machine learning has also begun playing a crucial role in enhancing sampling efficiency, reducing the need for extensive computational resources. As computational power continues to increase and machine learning techniques are integrated with enhanced sampling algorithms, the scope and accuracy of free energy calculations will significantly improve, opening new avenues for more precise understanding and prediction of molecular interactions and biological processes.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsAlgorithmsMachine LearningProtein ConformationProtein FoldingThermodynamicsProteinsEnergy landscapesEnhanced samplingFree energyMachine learningProtein dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41652161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.