Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652159›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026

From Atoms to Cells: AI-Based Structure Prediction Fueling Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Computational Structural Biology.

Rafael C Bernardi, Marcelo C R Melo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rafael C BernardiDepartment of Physics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. rcbernardi@auburn.edu.
Marcelo C R MeloDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The simulation of biological systems has undergone a revolutionary transformation, progressing from modeling single proteins to entire cellular environments. This leap forward is driven by the convergence of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and artificial intelligence (AI)-powered structure prediction. Traditionally, MD simulations provided atomic-level insights into protein function and interactions, yet their accuracy relied on experimentally determined structures. AI-based models, such as AlphaFold, now enable the rapid and accurate prediction of protein structures, expanding the scope of simulations beyond isolated biomolecules to complex assemblies. However, a structure alone is not sufficient to capture biological function. Molecular motion underlies almost all cellular processes, from enzyme catalysis to signal transduction. MD simulations breathe life into static models, revealing dynamic conformational changes and mechanistic pathways. With computational power and AI capabilities, we are now approaching the long-sought goal of simulating entire cellular processes with unprecedented resolution. This chapter explores how AI and MD are bridging the gap between static snapshots and dynamic cellular models, paving the way for whole-cell simulations. The ability to computationally reconstruct cellular behavior at the molecular scale is poised to transform biological research, drug discovery, and synthetic biology, marking an era in which digital cells become a fundamental tool in scientific exploration.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsAnimalsHumansProtein ConformationProteinsArtificial intelligenceMolecular dynamicsProtein structureStructural biology

Identifiers

PMID41652159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.