ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
Protein Structure Prediction Methods.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein structure prediction, a fundamental challenge emerging from the protein folding problem, forms the basis of modern computational biology. This field addresses the critical question of how the amino acids sequence determines its three-dimensional structure, a relationship critical to understanding biological function. Over the last four decades, methodologies have evolved from template-based modeling (TBM) and free modeling (FM) to advanced hybrid and end-to-end deep learning approaches. TBM explores sequence homology and threading to predict structures based on a known template, while FM applies physics-based principles to navigate the rugged energy landscape that governs protein folding, predicting de novo stable native conformations. Recent breakthrough methods in protein structure prediction include hybrid methods that integrate physics, bioinformatics, and machine learning, as well as end-to-end methods such as AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold, which have revolutionized the field by using neural networks to directly predict atomic coordinates from sequences, achieving near-experimental accuracy. Protein language models further advance the field by learning sequence-structure-function relationships directly from amino acid sequences, bypassing the need for multiple-sequence alignments. These innovations address the sequence-structure-function paradigm and find applications in drug discovery, enzyme engineering, and disease research. This chapter explores the principles, advances, and transformative impact of these methodologies on the structural biology field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41652158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.