ArticleScientific reports2026
ImageNet pre-training and two-step transfer learning in chromosome image classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromosome image classification typically relies on ImageNet pre-training, yet the potential of leveraging intermediate domains from related staining techniques remains largely underexplored. Here, we evaluate two-step transfer learning-where classifiers are first fine-tuned on an intermediate domain before targeting the final classification task-across Q-band (BioImLab dataset) and G-band (CIR dataset) chromosome classification. Each dataset serves as intermediate domain for the other. Across 11 architecture families and three training approaches, models achieve improvements when domain similarity is high and data quality is limited: modern architectures (ConvNeXt, Swin Transformer, ViT, MobileNetV3) show + 0.8 to + 3.3 percentage point gains in Macro-F1 on Q-band classification, while traditional CNNs benefit less or show no improvement. On the higher-quality G-band dataset, all architectures approach performance saturation, with minimal gains from two-step transfer (+ 0.1 to + 0.7 percentage points). Consistent results across both transfer directions demonstrate that, with appropriate architecture selection and intermediate domain similarity, two-step transfer learning can boost performance when target datasets are challenging, while ImageNet pre-training alone suffices for high-quality data. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/MuscleOne/chromosome_TL .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.