Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652089›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Evaluating AI-powered learning assistants in engineering higher education with implications for student engagement, ethics, and policy.

Ramteja Sajja, Yusuf Sermet, Brian Fodale, Ibrahim Demir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ramteja SajjaByWater Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, 70118, USA. rsajja@tulane.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-2472
Yusuf SermetByWater Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, 70118, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-8335
Brian FodaleOffice of Teaching, Learning, and Technology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2249-713X
Ibrahim DemirByWater Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, 70118, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-1242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into higher education, understanding how students engage with these technologies is essential for responsible adoption. This study evaluates the Educational AI Hub, an AI-powered learning framework, implemented in undergraduate civil and environmental engineering courses at a large R1 public university. Using a mixed-methods design combining pre- and post-surveys, system usage logs, and qualitative analysis of students' AI interactions, the research examines perceptions of trust, ethics, usability, and learning outcomes. Findings show that students valued the AI assistant for its accessibility and comfort, with nearly half reporting greater ease using it than seeking help from instructors or teaching assistants. The tool was most helpful for completing homework and understanding concepts, though views on its instructional quality were mixed. Ethical uncertainty, particularly around institutional policy and academic integrity, emerged as a key barrier to full engagement. Overall, students regarded AI as a supplement rather than a replacement for human instruction. The study highlights the importance of usability, ethical transparency, and faculty guidance in promoting meaningful AI engagement. A total of 71 students participated across two courses, generating over 600 AI interactions and 100 survey responses that provided both quantitative and contextual insights into learning engagement.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEngineeringLearningStudentsAcademiaFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesArtificial intelligence (AI)Educational technologyGenerative pre-trained transformer (GPT)Large language models (LLM)Personalized learning

Identifiers

PMID41652089
PMCPMC12932848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.