ReviewHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Diastasis recti in male patients: a literature review and proposed management.
Review in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAn increasing number of male patients are referred for surgical evaluation of their rectus diastasis (RD).Studies investigating the clinical relevance of RD in male patients, including the etiology, pathophysiology, and quality of life are limited. Additionally, no national or international consensus on the management of RD in male patients exist. The aim of this review is to summarize the current literature and discuss the management strategy.
methodsThis paper is a multidatabase literature-based scoping review conducted according to the SANRA guidelines investigating the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and management of the rectus diastasis in male patients, including different treatment strategies.
resultsTwenty-four studies were included. Studies without sex-stratified findings were excluded. Evidence focusing specifically on male symptomatology and quality of life was limited. Reported management strategies comprised physiotherapy-based core training, minimally invasive mesh repair and open plication (with or without mesh). Across studies, surgical outcomes were generally favorable, though data were heterogeneous and long-term outcomes were sparse.
conclusionRD is more common in male patients over 60 years old with obesity and low levels of physical activity. In most cases, the condition is asymptomatic, but may cause functional symptoms when a concomitant ventral hernia is present. If surgical repair is indicated, there are several surgical options and the choice depends on the individual symptomatology, anatomy and patient concerns. However, the role of RD plication in male patients remains uncertain, and its use should be used with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41652086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.