ArticleHealth economics review2026
Cost of chemotherapy-related care for breast cancer care: evidence and implications from a provider perspective at a public tertiary hospital in South Africa.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSouth Africa (SA) is an upper-middle-income country with high-income disparity and coexisting private and public healthcare systems that create considerably differing breast cancer (BC) treatment outcomes. State-funded BC care is available in the public tertiary and quaternary hospitals, including surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and radiation therapy, although the timely access to these modalities is often expensive and unpredictable. In a resource-constrained country like South Africa, understanding the total cost of BC care is crucial for health funders when budgeting and making decisions. There has been no systematic assessment of the financial impact of BC in the South African (SA) public sector.
objectivesTo estimate the cost of BC treatment with chemotherapy, including the associated costs, laboratory tests, radiological and consumables at a public tertiary hospital in SA. METHODOLOGY: The study design was descriptive and retrospective file review of patients with breast cancer to obtain patients’ data. The data collection lasted three months, from July 2022 to September 2022. The study population included files of all adult patients who had received chemotherapy between 2018 and 2022. A total of 364 patient files were examined.
resultsA total of 364 breast cancer patients were included, with a mean age of 55.5 ± 13.3 years. Most patients presented with advanced disease: 39% at stage 3B and 26.1% at stage 4. The overall direct cost of treatment was R4.8 million, with a mean cost per patient of R 13,365.90. The most significant cost drivers were laboratory tests (34%), administrative overheads (27%), and chemotherapy (22%). The most frequently prescribed chemotherapy regimen was CAF (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil), given to 70.9% of patients. Stage 1 is a major outlier, costing 55% less than the mean average, while Stage 2 A is the most expensive per-patient stage, costing 11.6% more than the mean average.
conclusionThis study showed that direct costs were substantial and primarily influenced by chemotherapy, administrative, and laboratory costs. This research indicates that the direct provider costs for breast cancer treatment at a South African public tertiary hospital are considerable. A significant proportion of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, but what drove the costs was repeated, cycle-based resource utilisation rather than by chemotherapy drug costs alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.