Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652083›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2026

Cost of chemotherapy-related care for breast cancer care: evidence and implications from a provider perspective at a public tertiary hospital in South Africa.

Ck Oladayo, M Sibanda, L Makhele, M Matlala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ck OladayoSchool of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.
M SibandaSchool of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9753-5284
L MakheleSchool of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa. Letlhogonolo.makhele@smu.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2689-663X
M MatlalaSchool of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4887-4757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Africa (SA) is an upper-middle-income country with high-income disparity and coexisting private and public healthcare systems that create considerably differing breast cancer (BC) treatment outcomes. State-funded BC care is available in the public tertiary and quaternary hospitals, including surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and radiation therapy, although the timely access to these modalities is often expensive and unpredictable. In a resource-constrained country like South Africa, understanding the total cost of BC care is crucial for health funders when budgeting and making decisions. There has been no systematic assessment of the financial impact of BC in the South African (SA) public sector.

objectivesTo estimate the cost of BC treatment with chemotherapy, including the associated costs, laboratory tests, radiological and consumables at a public tertiary hospital in SA. METHODOLOGY: The study design was descriptive and retrospective file review of patients with breast cancer to obtain patients’ data. The data collection lasted three months, from July 2022 to September 2022. The study population included files of all adult patients who had received chemotherapy between 2018 and 2022. A total of 364 patient files were examined.

resultsA total of 364 breast cancer patients were included, with a mean age of 55.5 ± 13.3 years. Most patients presented with advanced disease: 39% at stage 3B and 26.1% at stage 4. The overall direct cost of treatment was R4.8 million, with a mean cost per patient of R 13,365.90. The most significant cost drivers were laboratory tests (34%), administrative overheads (27%), and chemotherapy (22%). The most frequently prescribed chemotherapy regimen was CAF (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil), given to 70.9% of patients. Stage 1 is a major outlier, costing 55% less than the mean average, while Stage 2 A is the most expensive per-patient stage, costing 11.6% more than the mean average.

conclusionThis study showed that direct costs were substantial and primarily influenced by chemotherapy, administrative, and laboratory costs. This research indicates that the direct provider costs for breast cancer treatment at a South African public tertiary hospital are considerable. A significant proportion of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, but what drove the costs was repeated, cycle-based resource utilisation rather than by chemotherapy drug costs alone.

Indexed as

Breast cancerChemotherapyCostDirect costPerspectiveRetrospective

Identifiers

PMID41652083
PMCPMC12977498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.