ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
xGNN4MI: explainability of graph neural networks in 12-lead electrocardiography for cardiovascular disease classification.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for assessing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) is hindered by limitations in interpretability and explainability. To address this, we present xGNN4MI, an open-source framework for graph neural networks (GNNs) in ECG modeling for interpretable CVD prediction. Our framework facilitates modeling clinically relevant spatial relationships between ECG leads and their temporal dynamics. We integrated explainable AI (XAI) and developed a task-specific XAI evaluation and visualization workflow to identify ECG leads crucial to the model's decision-making process, enabling a systematic comparison with established clinical knowledge. We evaluated xGNN4MI on two challenging tasks: diagnostic superclass classification and localization of myocardial infarction. Our findings show that the interpretable ECG-GNN models demonstrate good performance across the tasks. XAI analysis revealed clinically meaningful training effects, such as differentiating between anteroseptal and inferior myocardial infarction. Our work demonstrates the potential of ECG-GNNs for providing trustworthy and interpretable AI-based CVD diagnosis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.