Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652051›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

xGNN4MI: explainability of graph neural networks in 12-lead electrocardiography for cardiovascular disease classification.

Miriam Cindy Maurer, Philip Hempel, Kristin Elisabeth Steinhaus, Hryhorii Chereda, Marcus Vollmer, Dagmar Krefting, Nicolai Spicher, Anne-Christin Hauschild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miriam Cindy MaurerDepartment of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. miriamcindy.maurer@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Philip HempelDepartment of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Kristin Elisabeth SteinhausDepartment of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Hryhorii CheredaBiomedical Network Science Lab, Department of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Marcus VollmerInstitute of Bioinformatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Dagmar KreftingDepartment of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Nicolai Spicher *Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne-Christin Hauschild *Institute for Predictive Deep Learning in Medicine and Healthcare, Justus-Liebig University Gießen, Gießen, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie 01KD2208ABundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie, Germany 01KD2414ABundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie, Germany 01ZZ9603Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss 01VSF20014Niedersächsische Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur 76211-12-1/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for assessing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) is hindered by limitations in interpretability and explainability. To address this, we present xGNN4MI, an open-source framework for graph neural networks (GNNs) in ECG modeling for interpretable CVD prediction. Our framework facilitates modeling clinically relevant spatial relationships between ECG leads and their temporal dynamics. We integrated explainable AI (XAI) and developed a task-specific XAI evaluation and visualization workflow to identify ECG leads crucial to the model's decision-making process, enabling a systematic comparison with established clinical knowledge. We evaluated xGNN4MI on two challenging tasks: diagnostic superclass classification and localization of myocardial infarction. Our findings show that the interpretable ECG-GNN models demonstrate good performance across the tasks. XAI analysis revealed clinically meaningful training effects, such as differentiating between anteroseptal and inferior myocardial infarction. Our work demonstrates the potential of ECG-GNNs for providing trustworthy and interpretable AI-based CVD diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID41652051
PMCPMC13021949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.