ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated and robust nonrigid registration of serial section microscopic images using PiCNoR.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate registration of serial-section microscopic images is essential for maintaining the spatial integrity of structural and functional information in biology and histology datasets, enabling critical advancements in 3D reconstruction and analysis. This paper introduces a new pixel-wise cluster-driven non-rigid registration (PiCNoR) method addressing the challenges in 3D microscopic imaging. PiCNoR utilizes feature-based local rigid registration as a foundational process, followed by clustering regions using Gaussian mixture models (GMM). Local rigid transforms are computed for these regions, validated through graph-based methods, and blended to achieve non-rigid transformations at the pixel level. This method is evaluated on three distinct datasets: the Kyoto embryo collection, a Drosophila brain stack, and a rat brain stack, demonstrating superior performance in preserving tissue continuity and reducing alignment errors compared to existing rigid transformations and established non-rigid approaches. A key advantage of this approach lies in its automated determination of the best number of clusters using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), ensuring a balance between model complexity and the ability to capture meaningful spatial variations within the feature sets, all without the necessity for manual intervention or the need to verify the registered results. Consequently, this leads to a substantial reduction in computational costs. The validation and blending steps enhanced robustness against outliers, ensuring the method's reliability in handling complex deformations and high-resolution datasets. The results highlight the versatility and potential of the PiCNoR approach for applications in microscopic imaging, enabling accurate and reliable 3D reconstructions across diverse research contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.