ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026
Comparative analysis of genomic prediction approaches for multiple time-resolved traits in maize.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond static snapshots: predicting dynamic, explainable intermediate phenotypes for climate-resilient crop breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ability to accurately predict multiple growth-related traits over plant developmental trajectories has the potential to revolutionize crop breeding and precision agriculture. Despite increased availability of time-resolved data for multiple traits from high-throughput phenotyping platforms of model plants and crops, genomic prediction is largely applied independently to a small number of traits, often neglecting their dynamics. Here, we compared and contrasted the performance of MegaLMM and dynamicGP as well as hybrid variants, using MegaLMM in place of RR-BLUP for component matrix prediction, which can handle high-dimensional temporal data for multi-trait genomic prediction. The comparative analysis made use of time series for 50 geometric, color, and texture traits in a maize multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) population. The performance of the approaches was assessed using snapshot and longitudinal accuracy, quantified as the Pearson correlation (PCC) and mean squared error (MSE), thereby providing insight into the ability to predict multiple traits at a single time point or the dynamics of individual traits over the considered time domain, respectively. We found that MegaLMM outperforms dynamicGP in terms of both snapshot and longitudinal PCC over an observed time interval, but not in terms of snapshot MSE. We also analyzed the characteristics of trait developmental trajectories associated with predictive performance. This study goes further to demonstrate that dynamicGP is the only time-dependent genomic prediction approach which can forecast multiple traits beyond the set of training time points and paves the way for careful investigation of factors that affect the capacity to predict dynamics of multiple traits from genetic markers alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.