Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652027›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026

Comparative analysis of genomic prediction approaches for multiple time-resolved traits in maize.

David Hobby, Robin Lindner, Alain J Mbebi, Hao Tong, Zoran Nikoloski

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David HobbyBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany.
Robin LindnerBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany.
Alain J MbebiBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany.
Hao TongPlant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zoran NikoloskiBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany. zniko@uni-potsdam.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-6763

Funding

Horizon 2020 862201Horizon Europe research and innovation program 101060393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ability to accurately predict multiple growth-related traits over plant developmental trajectories has the potential to revolutionize crop breeding and precision agriculture. Despite increased availability of time-resolved data for multiple traits from high-throughput phenotyping platforms of model plants and crops, genomic prediction is largely applied independently to a small number of traits, often neglecting their dynamics. Here, we compared and contrasted the performance of MegaLMM and dynamicGP as well as hybrid variants, using MegaLMM in place of RR-BLUP for component matrix prediction, which can handle high-dimensional temporal data for multi-trait genomic prediction. The comparative analysis made use of time series for 50 geometric, color, and texture traits in a maize multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) population. The performance of the approaches was assessed using snapshot and longitudinal accuracy, quantified as the Pearson correlation (PCC) and mean squared error (MSE), thereby providing insight into the ability to predict multiple traits at a single time point or the dynamics of individual traits over the considered time domain, respectively. We found that MegaLMM outperforms dynamicGP in terms of both snapshot and longitudinal PCC over an observed time interval, but not in terms of snapshot MSE. We also analyzed the characteristics of trait developmental trajectories associated with predictive performance. This study goes further to demonstrate that dynamicGP is the only time-dependent genomic prediction approach which can forecast multiple traits beyond the set of training time points and paves the way for careful investigation of factors that affect the capacity to predict dynamics of multiple traits from genetic markers alone.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsZea maysGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingPrediction AlgorithmsQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID41652027
PMCPMC12881034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.