ArticleScientific reports2026
Algorithmic analysis of the structure of mixed odontogenic tumors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to characterize the histomorphology of mixed odontogenic tumors, using mathematical morphology algorithms applied to digital images. Five cases of primordial odontogenic tumor (POT), 5 cases of ameloblastic fibroma, 5 cases of developing odontoma (DO), and 5 cases of tooth germs (TG) were analyzed. Histological sections stained with Haematoxylin & Eosin were digitized and the epithelial compartments were segmented into ‘virtual cells’ to further characterize the tissue compartment architecture. A comparison of the mean area of virtual epithelial cells in the entities investigated showed that, despite data distribution between the entities being similar, statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) were found, being larger for DO and smaller for AF. Additionally, DO exhibits a broader data distribution of the area compared to the other entities. Significant differences were not found between TG and POT without subepithelial condensation. Quantitative tissue analysis showed that, in focal areas, POT more closely resembles TG than other mixed odontogenic tumors. These findings suggest that virtual cell–based morphometric analysis may provide complementary quantitative information in diagnostically challenging cases, although validation in larger datasets is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.