Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41651983›Full record

ArticleCommunications engineering2026

OpenMetabolics: Estimating energy expenditure using a smartphone worn in a pocket.

Haedo Cho, Patrick Slade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haedo ChoJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Patrick SladeJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. slade@seas.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9302-3911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical inactivity is the fourth largest cause of global mortality. Health organizations have requested a tool to objectively measure physical activity because many specific and causal relationships between activity and health outcomes are not clearly understood. Existing activity monitors are either unsuitable for large-scale use or have substantial error. We present OpenMetabolics, a biomechanically-informed activity monitor that employs a smartphone in a pants pocket which measures leg motion to estimate energy expenditure. OpenMetabolics uses a data-driven machine learning model to capture the relationship between underlying leg muscle activity and energy expended during common physical activities. OpenMetabolics estimated energy expenditure with 18% cumulative error across all real-world activities, approximately two times lower than existing tools. We developed a pocket motion artifact correction model to accurately monitor energy expenditure when the smartphone is in a pocket of various types of clothing. A week-long, at-home monitoring study highlighted individual and population-level activity patterns across various timescales. We have made the data, code, and smartphone application open source. This accurate and accessible activity monitor could be deployed for large-scale studies with many patient populations to relate activity to health outcomes, inform health policy, and develop interventions.

Identifiers

PMID41651983
PMCPMC12917169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.