Trial reportScientific reports2026
Cardiovascular medications and treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma: insights from phase III clinical trials.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) often use cardiovascular medications due to their increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. This study investigated the associations of baseline use of these drugs with survival and adverse events in MM patients initiating daratumumab, lenalidomide, or bortezomib combination treatments. Data from Phase III trials (CASTOR, MAIA, and POLLUX) were analysed, focusing on beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), diuretics, and statins. Cox proportional hazard analysis and logistic regression were used to assess associations with survival and grade ≥ 3 adverse events. Among 1804 patients, ACEI/ARBs were most common (31%), followed by beta-blockers (23%), statins (21%), calcium channel blockers (17%), and diuretics (16%). ACEI/ARBs was associated with better progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) [95% CI] = 0.84 [0.71-0.99], P = 0.034) but also higher odds of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.45 [1.06-1.97], P = 0.019). Diuretics were similarly associated with grade ≥ 3 adverse events (aOR = 1.53 [1.01-2.34], P = 0.047). Other cardiovascular drugs showed no significant associations. While ACEI/ARBs may improve progression-free survival, they pose safety concerns. It is reassuring that other cardiovascular drugs were not significantly associated with MM treatment outcomes. Further research is essential to fully understand the implications of these medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.