Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41651940›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Nanoscale symmetry protection of the reciprocal acoustoelectric effect.

Sandeep Vijayan, Stephan Suffit, Scott E Cooper, Yejun Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandeep VijayanOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan.
Stephan SuffitOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan.
Scott E CooperOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan.
Yejun FengOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan. yejun@oist.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neumann’s principle states that all physical properties of a material are bound by its symmetry. While bulk crystals conform to well-defined point and space groups, phenomena at a substrate’s surface could have less apparent symmetry origins. Here we experimentally explore both reciprocal and non-reciprocal types of acoustoelectric effects driven by surface acoustic waves (SAW). The non-reciprocal acoustoelectric voltage is connected to the natural single-phase unidirectional transducer from device engineering. On the other hand, reciprocal acoustoelectric effect exists in certain SAW configurations that are of different symmetry origins. Half of the configurations have a valid reciprocity-preserving symmetry element of either a mirror plane or a two-fold rotational axis that is perpendicular to the substrate surface. The other half of the configurations do not possess a reciprocity-preserving symmetry element of the half-space but relate to the first scenario through an interchange of SAW propagation and the surface normal directions. Here, it is the symmetric construction in the equation of motion, which holds at nanoscale distances, to be responsible for the correspondence between two scenarios and extends the cases of reciprocal SAW states. This correspondence traces its physical origin to the SAW composition of compression and shear waves along two orthogonal directions respectively.

Indexed as

Surface acoustic wave; Microfabrication and device engineering; Acousto-electric effect; Non-reciprocity; Stroh's equation of motion;Symmetry

Identifiers

PMID41651940
PMCPMC12936158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.