Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41651938›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning model provides stress biomarkers for the classification of abiotic stress in Micro-Tom.

Laura Matos Ribera, Gilmar da Silveira Sousa Junior, Mariana Dias Meneses, Efraim Pereira Pimenta, Glauco de Souza Rolim, Ricardo Antunes de Azevedo, Priscila Lupino Gratão

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura Matos RiberaDepartment of Biology Applied to Agriculture, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, 14884900, Brazil.
Gilmar da Silveira Sousa JuniorInstituto Municipal de Ensino Superior Victório Cardassi (Imesb), Rua Nelson Domingos Madeira, 300 - Parque Eldorado, Bebedouro, São Paulo, 14706-124, Brazil.
Mariana Dias MenesesDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Access Road Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, Jaboticabal, 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Efraim Pereira PimentaDepartment of Biology Applied to Agriculture, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, 14884900, Brazil.
Glauco de Souza RolimDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Access Road Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, Jaboticabal, 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo Antunes de AzevedoDepartamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, 11, CP. 83, Piracicaba, 13418-900, Brazil.
Priscila Lupino GratãoDepartment of Biology Applied to Agriculture, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, 14884900, Brazil. pl.gratao@unesp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water deficit, salinity, and cadmium (Cd) contamination have generated an environmental problem worldwide, leading to damages to plant growth due to alteration in their metabolism. This study aimed to classify enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems in Micro-Tom (MT) plants when subjected to two intensities (moderate and severe) of water deficit, salinity, and Cd exposure. The experimental design was a completely randomized 3 × 2 factorial, with the first factor representing the stress agents (water deficit, salinity, and Cd) and the second factor indicating stress intensities (moderate and severe), along with a control group. After an acclimation period, plants were exposed to 10 days of stress. Water deficit treatments were imposed using solutions adjusted to osmotic potentials of − 0.40 MPa and − 1.00 MPa; salinity stress was established with nutrient solutions containing 40 mM or 120 mM NaCl; and Cd stress was induced using nutrient solutions with 0.25 mM or 0.5 mM CdCl₂. Laboratory analyses included lipid peroxidation, hydrogen peroxide content, proline accumulation, protein quantification, and enzyme extraction. Descriptive analyses, and a Spearman’s correlation, identified the behavior of enzymatic and non-enzymatic systems for each stress agents and intensities, enabling the selection of key influencing factors. A factorial analysis of variance was performed to assess the mean differences among the treatments (α = 0.05) for enzymatic, non-enzymatic systems, MDA and, H₂O₂. Using this data, a decision tree model classified the stresses into four levels: low, low-medium, medium-high, and high. Variations in antioxidant response and stress biomarkers were detailed, with proline and superoxide dismutase identified as the primary variables of significance across stress indicators. Furthermore, the model achieved robust classification performance with Matthew’s correlation coefficients exceeding 0.80 in the extreme classes; however, it encountered limitations in distinguishing between classes with closely proximate values. The findings indicate the capability of the decision tree to classify stress levels in plants.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMachine LearningStress, PhysiologicalAntioxidantsCadmiumHydrogen PeroxideLipid PeroxidationProlineSalinityAntioxidantsBiomarkersCadmiumHydrogen PeroxideProlineArtificial intelligenceDecision treeEnzymatic systemReactive oxygen speciesSolanum lycorpesicum L.

Identifiers

PMID41651938
PMCPMC12932719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.