ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Wearable EEG devices in the detection of mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Wearable EEG Devices: A Review of Lightweight, Multi-Sensor Systems for Sleep and Everyday Neurophysiology.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Beyond single-modality screening: toward an EEG-IoT dual-stream framework for early detection of mild cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable electroencephalography (EEG) devices are miniaturized, portable, and wireless systems for long-term brain monitoring, demonstrating significant potential as accessible mild cognitive impairment (MCI) screening tools based on objective neurophysiological biomarkers. However, their performance in MCI detection remains unclear, and their translation to real-world applications faces several challenges. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate wearable EEG for MCI detection, identify key characteristics that optimize classification performance and usability, and address gaps in effective design implementation. We conducted a systematic search across seven databases, screening 1562 records and analyzing 21 studies that examined 16 distinct wearable EEG devices for MCI detection. The results revealed considerable variation in classification accuracy (range: 46-95%). A system-level analysis of the entire wearable EEG system and data flow identified seven critical factors that optimize the trade-off between diagnostic performance, portability, and affordability: (1) moderate channel density; (2) frontal and parietal electrode placement; (3) elderly-friendly multi-domain cognitive tasks; (4) adaptive signal preprocessing; (5) multi-domain feature extraction; (6) ensemble classifiers; and (7) multimodal integration. Additionally, methodological considerations for future wearable EEG-based MCI detection research include: (1) standardize MCI diagnostic frameworks; (2) increase sample diversity; (3) optimizing device usability and technical specifications; (4) standardize recording protocols; (5) harmonizing data processing pipelines; (6) validate in real-world settings; (7) assess cost-effectiveness; and (8) implement comprehensive reporting guidelines. These insights enable further translational applications of wearable EEG-based MCI detection and provide a foundation for developing user-friendly systems that could transform early cognitive impairment screening in community and primary care settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.