Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41651921›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Mechanical performance of sutures exposed to natural extract-based mouthwashes.

Razan Alaqeely, Nisrin AlQahtani, Shahad Alrobaish, Heba Hamdan, Hessah Alduraihem, Raed Alrowis, Abdulaziz Alhotan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Razan AlaqeelyDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 12372, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. raqeely@ksu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6461-4552
Nisrin AlQahtaniDental Intern, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 12372, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shahad AlrobaishDental Intern, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 12372, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Heba HamdanDental Intern, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 12372, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hessah AlduraihemDental Intern, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 12372, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Raed AlrowisDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 12372, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz AlhotanDepartment of Dental Health, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 10219, 12372, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

the Ongoing Research Funding program King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia ORF-2025-790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the effects of natural herbal mouthwashes, dipotassium glycyrrhizinate, propolis extract, and a 1:1 combination of both, on the tensile strength of sutures commonly used in oral surgical procedures. Two types of absorbable sutures, polyglactin (PGA) and poliglecaprone 25 (PGCL), in sizes 3/0 and 4/0, were evaluated. Tensile strength was measured before and after immersion in five media (artificial saliva, chlorhexidine, and three herbal solutions) for 24 h, 3 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks. A universal testing machine applied a 50 N load at a constant rate of 2 mm/min. Statistically significant differences in tensile strength were observed across suture groups and immersion media (p < 0.05), whereas immersion duration did not have a significant effect (p = 0.059). Sutures immersed in artificial saliva exhibited the lowest strength values, whereas those exposed to herbal solutions generally maintained higher tensile strength. Across all time points, the combined dipotassium glycyrrhizinate-propolis solution produced the highest tensile strength for both suture types, followed by propolis alone; artificial saliva consistently showed the lowest tensile strength. For PGA 3/0 and 4/0, the greatest mean tensile strengths were typically observed with dipotassium glycyrrhizinate and/or propolis (alone or combined). In contrast, PGCL 3/0 and 4/0 showed no consistent differences among rinses, and most between-solution comparisons were not statistically significant. Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, herbal mouthwashes did not negatively affect the tensile strength of the evaluated suture materials. Their natural and biocompatible composition supports their potential as safe, patient-friendly alternatives for postoperative oral care.

Indexed as

MouthwashesPlant ExtractsSuturesChlorhexidineMaterials TestingPropolisSaliva, ArtificialTensile StrengthChlorhexidineMouthwashesPlant ExtractsPropolisSaliva, ArtificialHerbalMouthwashPGCLPLGPropolisSutureTensile strength

Identifiers

PMID41651921
PMCPMC12932740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.