ArticleScientific reports2026
SFEL a machine learning framework for forecasting radar backscatter based ground deformation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of soil deformation is crucial for mitigating landslide hazards in mountainous regions, such as the Himalayas, where terrain instability continually threatens infrastructure and livelihood. While previous models have often relied on either geotechnical data or satellite-based observations in isolation, this study presents an integrated and interpretable framework for forecasting radar-backscatter-based deformation. The proposed Stacked Forecasting Ensemble Learner (SFEL) merges geotechnical parameters, traditional soil indicators, and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)-derived ΔVV deformation proxies processed using the Google Earth Engine into a unified ensemble learning pipeline. Using dual feature selection Pearson correlation and mutual information, the model achieved strong predictive performance for both the 1-month and 6-month horizons, with low root mean squared errors of 0.01 and 0.03 ΔVV/year, respectively. Shapley additive explanations confirmed the complementary roles of traditional and scientific features, revealing distinct shifts in feature importance across various temporal scales. While the results indicate the robustness of the SFEL model, they also highlight certain limitations, including regional data constraints and the proxy nature of radar backscatter as a deformation indicator. Nonetheless, this study demonstrates that integrating experiential soil knowledge with remote sensing and machine learning can advance both predictive reliability and interpretability, offering a scalable pathway for informed slope management and regional-hazard monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.