ArticleScientific reports2026
Estimating cognitive workload in robot assisted surgery using time and frequency features from EEG epochs with random forest regression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive workload (CW) refers to the mental effort required to perform a task and is critical to monitor in high-stakes environments such as robot-assisted surgery (RAS), where excessive demand can impair decision-making and performance. This study proposes a machine learning framework to estimate CW using electroencephalography (EEG) signals, focusing on four cortical regions: frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital. EEG epochs were processed to extract both time-domain features (mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis, RMS, zero-crossings) and frequency-domain features (power spectral density across delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands). To enhance computational efficiency, data were downsampled from 500 to 128 Hz, with minimal signal degradation confirmed via topographic and spectrogram-based comparisons. Random Forest Regressor (RFR) was trained to predict region-specific EEG-derived CW scores, achieving high accuracy with R2 (coefficient of determination) values of 0.9947 (temporal), 0.9692 (parietal), 0.9635 (occipital), and 0.9329 (frontal), alongside low RMSE scores. Feature importance analysis identified kurtosis, RMS, and select power bands as key predictors. Model robustness was validated using tenfold cross-validation and statistical significance testing (p < 0.0001). Comparative evaluation with SVR, Linear Regression, and XGBoost confirmed the superior generalizability of the RFR model. Topographic EEG maps and time–frequency spectrograms visually supported region-specific activation patterns, reinforcing the effectiveness of spatially localized workload modeling. These findings demonstrate a promising, interpretable, and high-performing pipeline for EEG-based cognitive workload estimation, with broad implications for adaptive neuroergonomic systems in surgical and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.