SynthesisScientific reports2026
Efficacy of radial and focused shockwave therapy for tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of the efficacy of different types and intensities of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Extreme Diagnostic and Therapeutic Heterogeneity Limits Treatment Conclusions in Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A Systematic Review with Level-of-Evidence Stratification.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tendinopathy is a common musculoskeletal condition that impairs body function and quality of life. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy is a widely used non-invasive treatment method. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of radial shockwave therapy (RSWT) and focused shockwave therapy (FSWT) in the treatment of upper and lower limb tendinopathies, based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing pain intensity, physical function, muscle strength, and adverse effects. The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD420251011209. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EBSCOhost, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase was conducted to identify RCTs. Databases were searched from their inception until the last update-26 March 2025 for PubMed, EBSCOhost and Ovid MEDLINE, and 27 March 2025 for Embase. Review methods: Risk ratios and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.