Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41651864›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

StatLLM: A Dataset for Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models in Statistical Analysis.

Xinyi Song, Lina Lee, Kexin Xie, Xueying Liu, Xinwei Deng, Yili Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinyi SongDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US.
Lina LeeDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US.
Kexin XieDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US.
Xueying LiuDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US.
Xinwei DengDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US.
Yili HongDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US. yilihong@vt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1720-9540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coding capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have opened up new opportunities for automatic statistical analysis in machine learning and data science. However, before their widespread adoption, it is crucial to assess the accuracy of code generated by LLMs. A major challenge in this evaluation lies in the absence of a benchmark dataset for statistical code. To fill in this gap, this paper introduces StatLLM, an open-source dataset for evaluating the performance of LLMs in statistical analysis. The StatLLM dataset comprises three key components: statistical analysis tasks, LLM-generated SAS code, and human evaluation scores. The first component includes statistical analysis tasks spanning a variety of analyses and datasets, providing problem descriptions, dataset details, and human-verified SAS code. The second component features SAS code generated by GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama-3.1 70B for those tasks. The third component contains evaluation scores from human experts in assessing the correctness, effectiveness, readability, executability, and output accuracy of the LLM-generated code. We also illustrate the unique potential of the established benchmark dataset for (1) evaluating and enhancing natural language processing metrics, (2) assessing and improving LLM performance in statistical coding, and (3) developing and testing of next-generation statistical software - advancements that are crucial for data science and machine learning research. This paper has online supplementary materials.

Identifiers

PMID41651864
PMCPMC12987956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.