ArticleScientific data2026
A Large-Scale Peripheral Blood Cell Dataset for Automated Hematological Analysis.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
White blood cell classification is fundamental to hematological diagnosis, yet existing datasets are limited in scale and class diversity. We present a comprehensive peripheral blood cell dataset comprising 31,489 high-resolution microscopic images across 13 distinct cell classes, representing the largest publicly available collection for automated blood cell analysis. Images are acquired using the Sysmex DI-60 system from May-Grünwald-Giemsa-stained blood smears at 100 × magnification under standardized laboratory conditions. Expert hematologists with over 10 years of experience performed manual annotation with high inter-rater agreement (Cohen's kappa >0.85 for all classes). The dataset includes common cell types such as segmented neutrophils and lymphocytes, alongside diagnostically critical but rare subtypes, including myelocytes, blasts, and reactive lymphocytes. Images are organized into training, validation, and test splits (70:10:20 ratio) with consistent 368 × 368 pixel resolution. Baseline experiments using 14 deep learning architectures demonstrate the dataset's utility, with DenseNet-121 achieving 95.23% accuracy. KU-Optofil PBC Dataset addresses critical gaps in medical image analysis datasets and supports the development of robust automated hematology systems for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.