Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41651797›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

Blind Challenges Let Us See the Path Forward for Predictive Models.

John D Chodera, W Patrick Walters, Sriram Kosuri, James S Fraser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John D ChoderaComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, United States.
W Patrick WaltersOpenADMET, Boston, Massachusetts 01581, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2860-7958
Sriram KosuriOctant, Inc., Emeryville, California 94608-1016, United States.
James S FraserDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5080-2859

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of AI/ML models in drug discovery heralds an era of extraordinary progress but also raises urgent questions about whether the true predictive performance is as good as advertised. On-target prediction models often benefit from high-resolution structural or atomistic representations that capture the subtleties of binding affinity and pose. In contrast, off-target and ADMET liabilities have typically relied on more implicit representations of molecular interactions. Retrospective benchmarks often provide a misleading picture of how successful these diverse representations are at predicting properties, and the community lacks standardized, prospective comparisons. Blind challenges, such as the OpenADMET × ASAP × PolarisHub Challenge featured in this issue, are crucial for realistically evaluating progress, encouraging iterations, and directing collective efforts toward major accuracy barriers. With ongoing investment in large-scale, open data creation, and community-led challenges, predictive modeling is poised to rapidly transform drug discovery by enabling accurate, multiparameter optimization.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryModels, MolecularHumans

Identifiers

PMID41651797
PMCPMC12933711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.