ArticleThe journal of gene medicine2026
Chronic Granulomatous Disease: Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Brazilian Patients.
Article in The journal of gene medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction to "Chronic Granulomatous Disease: Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Brazilian Patients".The journal of gene medicine · 2026Article
- Chronic Granulomatous Disease: Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Brazilian Patients.The journal of gene medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a rare inborn error of immunity caused by defects in components of the NADPH oxidase that impair the elimination of infectious microorganisms. Individuals affected by CGD become more susceptible to recurrent and severe infections. Six male patients from Southern Brazil were clinically and genetically analyzed through data collection from medical records and massively parallel sequencing by a panel for the following genes: CYBB, CYBA, NCF1, NCF2, and NCF4 and whole genome sequencing analysis. The gene-scan technique was used to identify the GT deletion in NCF1. The most common affected organs were the lungs, skin, and lymph nodes; the most common clinical manifestations were recurrent pneumonia, cutaneous involvement, lymph node manifestations, and failure to thrive. Four patients were identified with variants in CYBB: p.Cys257Ser, which is novel; p.Cys257Arg; p.Arg157Ter; and p.Trp483Ter. Both missense variants damage the loop E in gp91
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.