ReviewClinics in chest medicine2026
Resuscitation Targets, Fluids, and Vasoactives in Septic Shock.
Review in Clinics in chest medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intravenous fluids and vasoactive medications represent the foundation of hemodynamic resuscitation for septic shock. Based on current evidence, initial fluid resuscitation of roughly 30 mL/kg with balanced crystalloids is reasonable for most patients. Carefully monitored peripheral vein administration of the first-line vasopressor, norepinephrine, appears safe. Ongoing multimodal assessment and therapy titration integrating blood pressure, lactate clearance, capillary refill time, and dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness yields outcomes equivalent to protocolized goal-directed resuscitation. However, better evidence is urgently needed for many common septic shock management issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.