ArticleBMJ open2026
Psychological recovery of nurses after emergencies and disasters: a systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith the increasing frequency and intensity of disasters globally-and their profound effects on the mental well-being of healthcare professionals, particularly nurses-the psychological distress experienced by nurses following natural disasters has become a pressing issue. This study aims to explore prevalent patterns and effective interventions for supporting nurses' psychological recovery after disaster exposure, ultimately aiming to propose an optimal recovery model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review will include qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies, as well as relevant systematic reviews, published in English between 2010 and 2025. A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed independently by multiple reviewers, with methodological quality and risk of bias evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Due to anticipated heterogeneity, findings will be synthesised using thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol raises no ethical issues. The results will be shared through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at appropriate academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251014914.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.