ArticleJournal of medicinal chemistry2026
Cellular Context Influences Kinase Inhibitor Selectivity.
Article in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Riding toward Selectivity: Optimization of Covalent 7-Azaindole-Based BMX Kinase Inhibitors.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Quantification of Binding of Small Molecules to Native Kinases by Flow Cytometry Reveals Divergence from Biochemical Affinities.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- A Type II CDK6 Degrader Enables Cellular Targeting beyond the Limits of Type II Inhibition.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Practical Use of Advanced AI Frameworks on Real-Life Scientific Problems: Three Case Studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A pivotal part of kinase chemical probe and drug development is assessment of the selectivity of a putative lead compound. While there is no consensus around the panel size or the type of assay(s) that are most appropriate, there is concurrence that gauging the number of on- and off-targets of a kinase inhibitor is essential. As pharmacology takes place in cells, we have compared profiling results for ten kinase inhibitors generated using the cell-free assays to those obtained when a panel of cellular target engagement NanoBRET assays is used to assess selectivity in intact cells. This is the first systematic comparison of these two approaches across a broad kinase panel. Comparison of the data sets demonstrates divergent results that can influence chemical probe prioritization. We identify unanticipated kinase interactions in cells for type II kinase inhibitors that are not observed in biochemical, cell-free systems. Furthermore, we characterize TPKI-39 as a DDR1, DDR2, and FLT1 chemical probe based on its in-cell selectivity profile.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.