ArticleAcademic pediatrics2026
ICD-10 Codes Used in Pediatric Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence.
Article in Academic pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIdentify common diagnostic codes for pediatric visits related to caregiver intimate partner violence (IPV) in a health care system.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of pediatric encounters for IPV-related care at a single urban health care system from July 2019 to June 2022. The study included visits to the pediatric emergency department (PED) or child advocacy center (CAC) following a child protective service referral. ICD-10-CM codes associated with each visit were descriptively summarized. We examined the relationship between the site of evaluation and the use of IPV-related diagnostic codes.
resultsAmong 92 pediatric encounters (39 in the PED, 53 in the CAC), we identified 174 distinct ICD-10 codes. A majority of encounters, 78 (85%), were associated with IPV-related diagnostic codes, suspected abuse and/or a social concern (eg, Z63, T74, T76, Z60). CAC encounters were more likely to have IPV-related diagnostic codes when compared to PED evaluations (98% vs 66%, P<.01). CONCLUSION(S): In the current study, ICD-10 code groups Z63, T74, T76, and Z60 were frequently used to document IPV exposure; however, their use varied significantly between the CAC and the PED. This variability may reflect both uncertainty among health care providers regarding documentation practices, along with concerns about the safety of children and caregivers following such disclosure. Additionally, the identified code groups lack specificity for IPV, limiting their effectiveness for systematically identifying such encounters. Given these limitations, ICD-10 codes alone may not constitute a robust mechanism for identifying IPV exposure in pediatric encounters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.