ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2026
Mendelian randomization linking metabolites with enzymes reveals pathway regulation and therapeutic avenues.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reactions between metabolites are catalyzed by enzymes. These biochemical reactions form complex metabolic networks, which are only partially characterized in humans and whose regulation remains poorly understood. Here, we assess human biochemical reactions and regulation using Mendelian randomization (MR), a genetic observational causal inference technique, to understand the methods' strengths and weaknesses in identifying metabolic reactions and regulation. We combine four metabolite and two protein quantitative trait locus (QTL) studies to determine how well MR recovers 945 curated canonical enzyme-substrate/product relationships. Using genetic variants from an enzyme's transcribed (cis) region as instrumental variables, MR-inferred estimates have high precision (35%-47%) but low recall (3.2%-4.6%) for identifying the substrates and products of an enzyme. Testing reverse causality from metabolites to enzymes using genome-wide instruments yields lower precision (1.8%-8.5%) and recall (1.0%-1.9%) due to an increased multiple-testing burden. Literature review of 106 Bonferroni-significant results identifies 45 links (43%) confirmed by different degrees of evidence, including bidirectional links between linoleate and cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) levels (p = 8.6 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.