ArticleHearing research2026
Differences in hearing across the lifespan in two strains of Alzheimer's mouse models as measured using behavioral and physiological techniques.
Article in Hearing research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a brain condition with heterogeneity in disease progression due to genetic and environmental variables. There is a critical need to better understand the relationship of AD pathologies and potential modifiable factors like hearing loss. Auditory processing measurements in AD mouse models have been reported, but the results are mixed. Most were conducted using evoked potential recordings measured under anesthesia, unlike typical hearing assessments on aging adult humans. Here, we used operant conditioning and signal detection theory to measure daily pure tone behavioral detection throughout the lifespan of trained mutant and wild-type (WT) control APP/PS1 (on a C57BL/6J background) and 5xFAD (on a C57/SJL background) mice. At the conclusion of operant testing, auditory brainstem response (ABR) measures were taken on the same subjects to determine if evoked potentials provided accurate estimates of perceptual abilities. Behavioral detection worsened significantly across the lifespan in APP/PS1 mice, but there were no differences between mutant and WT mice. For 5xFAD mice, behavioral thresholds generally worsened over the lifespan but with substantial variability, which may be explained by genetic heterogeneity among the background strain. There were no differences between 5xFAD mutant and WT mice. ABR hearing threshold estimates generally matched behavioral findings, with APP/PS1 having significantly worse thresholds than 5xFAD mice but no within-model differences between mutants and WTs. The within-subject differences between behavioral and ABR thresholds ranged from <1 dB to over 40 dB across subjects, suggesting physiological measurements of auditory function are not necessarily reflective of an animal's acoustic perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.