Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41650876›Full record

ArticleHearing research2026

Differences in hearing across the lifespan in two strains of Alzheimer's mouse models as measured using behavioral and physiological techniques.

Payton E Charlton, Kali Burke, Sevda Abdavinejad, Mariam Ashour, Zachary Zaharkin, Riley McLaughlin, Srijita Paul, Amanda M Lauer, Micheal L Dent

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Payton E CharltonDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 211 Mary Talbert Way, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Kali BurkeCenter for Hearing and Balance, Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Sevda AbdavinejadDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 211 Mary Talbert Way, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Mariam AshourDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 211 Mary Talbert Way, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Zachary ZaharkinDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 211 Mary Talbert Way, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Riley McLaughlinDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 211 Mary Talbert Way, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Srijita PaulCenter for Hearing and Balance, Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Amanda M LauerCenter for Hearing and Balance, Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Micheal L DentDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 211 Mary Talbert Way, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. Electronic address: mdent@buffalo.edu.

Funding

Behavioral and physiological measurements of hearing in mouse models of Alzheimer's DiseaseR03AG081747 · NIA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI DENT, MICHEAL L, LAUER, AMANDA M. · 2023 to 2024
$509k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG081747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a brain condition with heterogeneity in disease progression due to genetic and environmental variables. There is a critical need to better understand the relationship of AD pathologies and potential modifiable factors like hearing loss. Auditory processing measurements in AD mouse models have been reported, but the results are mixed. Most were conducted using evoked potential recordings measured under anesthesia, unlike typical hearing assessments on aging adult humans. Here, we used operant conditioning and signal detection theory to measure daily pure tone behavioral detection throughout the lifespan of trained mutant and wild-type (WT) control APP/PS1 (on a C57BL/6J background) and 5xFAD (on a C57/SJL background) mice. At the conclusion of operant testing, auditory brainstem response (ABR) measures were taken on the same subjects to determine if evoked potentials provided accurate estimates of perceptual abilities. Behavioral detection worsened significantly across the lifespan in APP/PS1 mice, but there were no differences between mutant and WT mice. For 5xFAD mice, behavioral thresholds generally worsened over the lifespan but with substantial variability, which may be explained by genetic heterogeneity among the background strain. There were no differences between 5xFAD mutant and WT mice. ABR hearing threshold estimates generally matched behavioral findings, with APP/PS1 having significantly worse thresholds than 5xFAD mice but no within-model differences between mutants and WTs. The within-subject differences between behavioral and ABR thresholds ranged from <1 dB to over 40 dB across subjects, suggesting physiological measurements of auditory function are not necessarily reflective of an animal's acoustic perception.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBehavior, AnimalHearingAcoustic StimulationAge FactorsAgingAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory AcuityAuditory ThresholdConditioning, OperantDisease Models, AnimalEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorPresenilin-15xFADABRsAlzheimer’s diseaseAPP/PS1Behavioral detection

Identifiers

PMID41650876
PMCPMC13202481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.