Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41650449›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2026

Developing Consumer Consensus on Remote Assessment and Management of Physical Function in Older Adults (RAMP): International Modified Delphi Process.

Elsa Dent, Christopher Hurst, Jack Dalla Via, Jackson J Fyfe, Paul Jansons, Eleanor J Hayes, Gary Skinner, Marc Sim, Mylene Aubertin-Leheudre, Sabine Britting and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Elsa DentDivision of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4006-3992
Christopher HurstAGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-6599
Jack Dalla ViaInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-0838
Jackson J FyfeInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9541-2336
Paul JansonsInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8766-0516
Eleanor J HayesDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-540X
Gary SkinnerInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2938-3768
Marc SimNutrition & Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5166-0605
Mylene Aubertin-LeheudreDépartement des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Faculté des Sciences, Groupe de Recherche en Activité Physique Adaptée (GRAPA), Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6796-6710
Sabine BrittingInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8237-6105
Fanny BuckinxDépartement des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Faculté des Sciences, Groupe de Recherche en Activité Physique Adaptée (GRAPA), Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9900-9157
Gavin ConnollyMetabolism and Healthy Aging Research Center (MHARC), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6419-4623
Ruth DignamIPAN Consumer Network, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9172-2188
Lora GiangregorioSchlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3739-1805
Jennifer R A JonesPhysiotherapy Department, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9443-3426
Pauline KellyIPAN Consumer Network, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Robert KobInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0406-092X
Suzanne N MorinDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4317-492X
Girish NandakumarDepartment of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2181-5332
Lucas B R OrssattoCentre for Sensorimotor Performance, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3788-3700
Maria PearsonMaria Pearson Coaching, Havelock North, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4897-3007
Daniel PintoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5771-101X
Esmee M ReijnierseDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4197-4800
Catherine M SaidPhysiotherapy Department, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-9750
Mohamed SalemGeriatrics, Active Ageing and Community Care, Ministry for Health and Active Ageing, Valletta, Malta.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3966-7656
Vina Ps TanExercise and Sports Science Programme, School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0562-734X
Rosanna TranRehabilitation and Aged Care Services, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8724-5482
Jesse ZankerDepartment of Medicine - Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3463-6827
Robin M DalyInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-1598
David ScottInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-1972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote health care delivery, including the use of digital health interventions, is emerging as a tool for assessing and managing physical function, but its design and implementation often overlook the needs and preferences of older adult end users.

objectiveThe primary aim of this modified Delphi process was to develop consumer consensus on preferences for remote assessment and management of physical function in older adults.

methodsResearch and consumer experts of the Remote Assessment and Management of Physical Function in Older Adults (RAMP) Working Group co-developed the Round 1 Delphi survey, which was advertised to consumers (adults aged ≥60 years) via international clinical and research networks and social media between August and November 2023. The online survey presented 23 Delphi statements for which respondents reported their level of agreement using an 11-point Likert scale (0-10; scores ≥7 indicated agreement). Statements were classified as having "strong agreement" and achieving consensus if ≥80% of participants indicated agreement. Statements classified as having "moderate" (70%-80% of participants indicated agreement) or "low" (<70% of participants indicated agreement) agreement were revised or rejected. Revised statements were presented to participants in Round 2 (January to February 2024), and the final consensus statements were consolidated into recommendations.

resultsA total of 654 consumers (75.7% female) with a mean age of 69.0 (SD 6.0) years from 15 countries (5 continents) were included in analyses in Round 1. Of 23 statements, 13 achieved consensus, with the strongest agreement observed for statements relating to the importance of physical function for quality of life and performing activities of daily living (6 statements; agreement 97.6%-99.5%). Two statements regarding privacy and security concerns when using technology (agreement 20.8%) and the inability to perform physical function assessments or exercise at home (agreement 15.5%) were rejected with low agreement. The remaining 8 statements (agreement 49.5%-79.5%) were modified into 7 new statements for the Round 2 survey, which was completed by 526 (80.4%) respondents from Round 1. Five of seven Round 2 statements were accepted with strong agreement (agreement 80%-82.7%), including the importance of addressing personal preferences for self- versus clinician-led remote interventions, group versus individual exercise, and availability of necessary resources (eg, technology and exercise equipment).

conclusionsEighteen statements achieved consensus and were translated into 7 recommendations highlighting that older adults recognize physical function as a health priority, would value more information about it, and are willing to participate in remote assessment and management interventions (including via digital health) to maintain or improve it. These recommendations also reinforce that interventions should be easily accessible and meet individual preferences of consumers.

Indexed as

ConsensusGeriatric AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overDelphi TechniqueDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineagedDelphi techniquedigital healthexercisephysical functionremote consultation

Identifiers

PMID41650449
PMCPMC12924037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.