Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41650213›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Transmission matrix of a multimode fiber: In-line vs off-axis holography.

Aleksandra Ivanina, Benjamin Lochocki, Andreas Koglbauer, Sergei Sokolov, Sebastianus A Goorden, Lyubov V Amitonova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aleksandra IvaninaAdvanced Research Center for Nanolithography (ARCNL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1296-9828
Benjamin LochockiAdvanced Research Center for Nanolithography (ARCNL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-3944
Andreas KoglbauerSCHOTT AG, Mainz, Germany.
Sergei SokolovASML Research, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Sebastianus A GoordenASML Research, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Lyubov V AmitonovaAdvanced Research Center for Nanolithography (ARCNL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimode fibers (MMFs) hold great promise for a variety of imaging applications. However, controlling the complex propagation of light through thousands of modes in MMFs remains a challenging task. To enable precise wavefront control, the MMF transmission matrix (TM) must be accurately measured. In this paper, we compare in-line and off-axis holography as phase retrieval techniques for TM measurement within a single optical setup. The quality of wavefront shaping is analyzed for different target shapes, including single-mode and complex free-form projections. Our findings reveal a trade-off in wavefront shaping: while in-line holography achieves superior focus quality for single-mode targets, off-axis holography excels in projecting complex-shaped targets. These experimental findings provide a basis for choosing and optimizing holographic techniques in MMF-based imaging setups.

Indexed as

HolographyOptical FibersAlgorithms

Identifiers

PMID41650213
PMCPMC12880716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.