ArticlePloS one2026
Perceived sound localization abilities in blind individuals.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Functional Impacts of Vision Impairment: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is extensive research on sound localization performance of blind individuals in laboratory settings. However, less is known about their spatial hearing experiences in more complex everyday environments. This study aims to assess the perceived sound localization abilities in blind individuals in common everyday tasks, which is a critical determinant of confidence and engagement in such tasks (e.g., independent travel).
methodFifty-eight adults with total or near-total blindness, including 28 with self-reported normal hearing and 30 with self-reported hard of hearing participated in this study. They completed the Dual Sensory Spatial Localization Questionnaire (DS-SLQ), a recently developed instrument that evaluates perceived difficulty in everyday localization tasks using vision and hearing. Properties of the DS-SLQ for blind individuals, including whether its items measure a single attribute (i.e., unidimensionality) and whether item difficulties match blind individuals' perceived abilities (i.e., targeting), were validated using Rasch analysis. Multivariable regression models and correlation analysis evaluated the impacts of the onset of blindness, residual vision, hearing status, onset of hearing loss, use of hearing aids, and echolocation skills on perceived sound localization abilities.
resultsThe DS-SLQ showed excellent targeting and good unidimentionality for blind individuals. Individuals with later onset of blindness reported significantly lower perceived sound localization abilities. The presence of hearing loss, particularly early onset, was associated with further reductions in perceived sound localization ability. Those who reported higher echolocation skills also reported better perceived sound localization abilities, regardless of their hearing status. Residual vision and use of hearing aids were not associated with perceived sound localization abilities.
conclusionBeyond frequently studied vision factors, hearing loss and its onset further affect perceived sound localization abilities and the likelihood of an individual being an echolocator. It is critical to consider hearing status in the rehabilitation of blind individuals for maintaining and enhancing spatial localization skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.