Observational studyPloS one2026
Gut microbiome compositional clusters in association with cardiovascular risk: An observational cohort study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe gut microbiome (GM) is increasingly recognized for its role in atherosclerosis development. However, its potential as a biomarker for risk-stratification in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities remains under-explored. This study aimed to identify distinct GM clusters associated with elevated CV risk.
methodsIn this prospective observational cohort, patients with coronary artery disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes mellitus referring to Mayo Clinic from 2013 to 2018 were enrolled. Bacterial DNA was analyzed in the V3-V5 region of 16S rDNA. Beta-diversity was plotted using Principal Coordinates Analysis. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the GM classified participants into two clusters. Cox regression evaluated the association between clusters and Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac events, heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance identified clinical factors contributing to cluster assignment. Linear Discriminant analysis identified GM taxa with differential abundance among clusters and their effect sizes.
resultsAmong 211 participants (median age 60 [IQR: 50-70] years; 57.3% male), two distinct GM profiles emerged (Cluster H: N = 104; Cluster L: N = 107, P < 0.001). Cluster L participants were younger (P < 0.001), more likely female (P = 0.009), and had healthier CV profiles, including lower BMI (P = 0.007), hypertension (P = 0.010), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.005), and lower coronary artery disease prevalence (P = 0.003). Over a median follow-up of 7.4 years, Cluster L had a significantly lower incidence of MACE compared to Cluster H (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26-0.91, P = 0.024). Cluster L had higher operational taxonomic units (P < 0.001) and lower Bacillota-to-Bacteroidetes ratio (P < 0.001) compared to Cluster H. The predominant taxa in Cluster L included Bacteroides, Alistipes, and Parabacteroides, whereas Blautia, Agathobacter, and Clostridium sensu stricto-1 were more abundant in Cluster H.
conclusionDistinct GM profiles are associated with varying CV risk, highlighting the potential of unsupervised GM profiling as a novel tool for risk stratification and individualized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.