ArticlePloS one2026
Vancomycin variable Enterococci in the Netherlands (2018-2023) and the mechanism of resistance induction.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Vancomycin-variable enterococci as a silent reservoir of resistance: characterization of the first reported vancomycin-variableFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enterococci are common human commensals but can cause severe infections in immunocompromised patients. Enterococcus faecium is a notable example, capable of acquiring resistance to multiple antibiotics, including the critically important drug vancomycin. Such strains, known as vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE), are routinely detected in clinical laboratories using phenotypic assays. However, some isolates carry vancomycin resistance genes yet remain phenotypically susceptible; these are termed vancomycin variable enterococci (VVE). Because phenotypic assays may fail to identify VVE, patients treated with glycopeptides risk developing undetected VRE infections. VVE have been reported in Scandinavia and Japan, but their prevalence in the Netherlands remains largely unknown. To address this gap, two large Dutch clinical microbiology laboratories collaborated to screen enterococcal isolates for vancomycin resistance genes using molecular assays. Among 477 isolates tested, six carried van genes while remaining vancomycin-susceptible. Three of these subsequently developed vancomycin resistance in vitro. All three were Enterococcus faecium ST117 strains carrying a chromosomal vanB2 operon, likely linked to the same outbreak. Genomic analysis revealed three mutations in the van operon regulator proteins: vanR (T189K) and vanS (G253C, L282V). We conclude that: (1) VVE are present in the Dutch population and may spread between patients; (2) VVE can develop into VRE upon vancomycin exposure; (3) specific mutations in regulatory proteins may underlie this phenotype; and (4) diagnostic policies should balance the low prevalence of VVE against their potential to cause severe complications, using sensitive molecular tests when appropriate. Our findings emphasize the importance of surveillance in revealing hidden threats and guiding clinical microbiology strategies, particularly with respect to VVE as precursors of VRE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.