ArticlePloS one2026
Simultaneous triclosan degradation and nitrate reduction by a UV/Sulfite/Phenol process based on sulfite radical mechanism: dechlorination, mineralization, and bioassessment.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Industrial development has increased the introduction of pollutants such as nitrate (NO₃⁻) and triclosan (TCS) into the environment, both of which pose significant environmental and health risks. The experiments were carried out in a 150 ml glass tube (photoreactor) equipped with a UV lamp (mercury vapor lamp (16 W) with a quartz cover operated at a controlled temperature (21 ± 2 °C), with an ultraviolet (UV) lamp and 2 mg/L dissolved oxygen. In the UV/sulfite process, the weak S-S bonds of sulfite, when exposed to UV radiation, produce SO3•- radicals. The study assessed the effects of sulfite concentration, reaction time, pH, and pollutant levels on treatment efficiency. At pH 3 and 7 with 50 mg/L concentrations of TCS and NO₃ ⁻ , TCS removal efficiencies were 23% and 100%, while NO₃ ⁻ removal was 18% and 68%, respectively. Increasing sulfite from 50 to 200 mg/L improved results, achieving 85% NO₃⁻ and 100% TCS reduction in 90 minutes. SMP outperformed UV and sulfite-only treatments, achieving 68% and 100% reductions after 180 minutes. The process also led to partial nitrate-to-nitrite conversion, which decreased over time. In the SMP process, the values of Kobs (min-1) were 0.017, 0.031 for NO3- and TCS and EEM (kWh m-3), 0.3 and 0.2, respectively.Chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total organic carbon (TOC) reduced notably, and toxicity levels dropped dramatically. Given its high efficiency, low energy consumption, and minimal environmental impact, the SMP process shows significant potential for practical scale-up in wastewater treatment applications, especially in industries dealing with persistent organic pollutants and high nitrate concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.