ArticlePloS one2026
Workforce, succession planning, and optimism for the future among Swiss general practitioners with additional training in complementary medicine in 2016: A nationwide cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The shortage of general practitioners (GPs) and the aging workforce of established GPs in Switzerland are persistent. Furthermore, data on GPs with additional training in complementary medicine (CM) are lacking. This study aimed to obtain information on GPs with training in CM. A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted using an anonymous online survey to assess the demographics, practice structures, workloads, and future perspectives. The participants were members of four CM societies representing doctors with CM certificates (n = 1,067) in traditional Chinese medicine/acupuncture (TCM/A), homeopathy (HOM), anthroposophical medicine, and phytotherapy. Overall, 206 GPs were included and divided into three groups: TCM/A (n = 73), HOM (n = 76), and others (n = 57). Most participants were male, and approximately half worked in double or group practices. They worked an average of 36 h per week, which had decreased by 13 h over the past 5 years, with plans for further reduction in the future. Approximately 18% planned to continue working beyond the retirement age, and 4% wanted to retire before that age. The majority expressed optimism about the future of CM in Swiss healthcare but less for individual CM disciplines. Compared to the 2015 Swiss Workforce Study, more CM GPs were female, worked less often in group practices, made fewer house calls, and were more optimistic about the future. CM-GPs in Switzerland face the same challenges as conventional GPs. National action and collaboration are needed to improve working conditions and to address the trend towards part-time work and an ageing workforce to safeguard healthcare for the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.