ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Quantifying household liquid medicine dosing errors in Sri Lanka: A hidden public health risk.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inaccurate measurement of liquid medicines remains a critical yet underrecognized patient safety concern in low-resource settings. In Sri Lanka, despite the adoption of metric units in formal healthcare, the use of uncalibrated household items such as teaspoons and tablespoons remains widespread. Bulk dispensing without standardized measuring aids is common, and dosing instructions often rely on informal household measures. This study assessed the volume accuracy of commonly used household liquid medicine measuring tools in a Sri Lankan suburb, highlighting their potential contribution to dosing errors. A cross-sectional survey of 50 households in Karapitiya, Galle District, Sri Lanka, was conducted. Frequently used measuring devices were tested using validated weighing and volumetric methods. Accuracy was evaluated against United States Pharmacopoeial (USP) specifications for acceptable deviation limits. Only 53.4% of measuring cups met USP accuracy standards across all tested volumes, although 86.2% complied for the 5.00 mL mark. Meanwhile, 62.5% of graduated measuring spoons failed to meet the standard. Household teaspoons and tablespoons demonstrated substantial variability, with volumes ranging from 2.893-7.759 mL and 4.252-15.043 mL, respectively. Over 93% of both spoon types delivered less than their expected standard volumes. The study discloses widespread inaccuracy in common dosing tools used in Sri Lankan households, posing avoidable risks to medication safety. It calls for urgent regulatory action to mandate standardized, calibrated devices and integrate user education into prescribing and dispensing practices. These findings point out a critical safety gap in primary care, particularly in low- and middle-income settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.