ArticlePloS one2026
Beyond the counter: Pharmacists' preparedness and response strategies in terrorism-related emergencies in Quetta, Pakistan.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Terrorism-related disasters (TRDs) continue to exert profound and recurring pressures on healthcare systems, particularly in vulnerable regions like Pakistan. Although pharmacists are increasingly recognized as an essential component of disaster management, there is a clear gap in the literature regarding their preparedness, experience, and specific roles in responding to TRDs particularly in low and middle-income countries. This study aimed to explore the preparedness, experiences, and response strategies of pharmacists managing TRDs at the Trauma Centre of Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan. A qualitative design was adopted, guided by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with pharmacists (n = 10) providing services at the Trauma Centre. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, validated by participants, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Analysis revealed five overarching themes: (1) pharmacists' experiences with terrorism-related incidents and existing response mechanisms; (2) professional and personal responses to emergencies, reflecting both commitment and psychological burden; (3) preparedness challenges, including lack of disaster management training, limited awareness of policies and protocols, and inadequate understanding of triage and coordination; (4) barriers such as security risks, pharmacy curriculum deficiencies, insufficient experiential learning, and minimal involvement in planning and management activities; and (5) recommendations for strengthening capacity, including revising curricula, implementing structured training programs, conducting regular disaster drills, and expanding pharmacists' roles in preparedness and response. Findings revealed a pronounced lack of formal training in disaster management, limited awareness of protocols and triage systems, and minimal involvement of pharmacists in planning and coordination activities. Despite strong professional commitment and frontline engagement, pharmacists' contribution remain constrained by educational, structural, and policy-level shortcomings. The study highlights the urgent need for integrating disaster management into pharmacy curricula, implementing structured training programs and regular disaster drills, and expanding pharmacists' roles within institutional and national disaster preparedness frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.