SynthesisInternational journal of epidemiology2025
Maternal prenatal infection and childhood leukaemia: a Childhood Cancer and Leukemia International Consortium (CLIC) meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaternal prenatal infections may affect fetal development, increasing the immunological vulnerability of offspring to childhood leukaemia (CL). The role of maternal infections in CL is unclear and might vary by subtype (lymphoblastic, ALL; myeloid, AML) or other characteristics. Understanding this potentially modifiable risk factor could inform prevention strategies.
methodsSeventeen hospital- and population-based case-control studies of children born in 1972-2019 within the Childhood Cancer and Leukemia International Consortium with self-questionnaires or health-registry data on maternal infection were included (13 638 cases; 26 870 controls). Meta-analyses assessed CL and maternal infection (overall, viral, bacterial, respiratory, influenza/cold, urinary, genital) stratified by subtype, infection timing, race and ethnicity, and diagnosis age.
resultsThe adjusted meta-analysis odds ratio (OR) for any maternal prenatal infection was 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.40], with similar estimates for ALL and AML. Infection-specific estimates varied. ORs for first-trimester infections were highest for CL and ALL, but not AML, although all CIs contained one. We found modest risk differences between White and Hispanic/Latino children, most notably for CL diagnosed at <2 years (White children: OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53; Hispanic/Latino children: OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34-1.81, subgroup difference P = .05), with similar differences for viral and respiratory/influenza/cold infections.
conclusionAlthough findings only modestly support an association between maternal prenatal infections and CL, some infections might increase the risk more markedly in young White children compared with Hispanic/Latino children. Risk patterns across race and ethnicity, type, and timing of maternal prenatal infection merit further investigation, as do studies with documented exposure information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.