ArticleBlood advances2026
Prospective feasibility study of peripheral blood for MRD detection in acute myeloid leukemia by flow cytometry.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractMulticolor flow cytometry (MFC) is widely used for measurable residual disease (MRD) detection in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is currently recommended to be performed on bone marrow (BM) aspirate only. However, BM aspiration is invasive and sometimes inadequate, whereas the peripheral blood (PB) offers a patient-friendly practical alternative. We first analyzed 53 paired PB and BM samples (30 MRD negative, 23 MRD positive) and observed 100% concordance with strong correlation (r = 0.945; P< .001). The assay was then prospectively evaluated in 118 patients, including 63 patients with newly diagnosed AML in postinduction remission (24 intensive and 30 less intensive), with results corroborated by molecular, cytogenetic, and follow-up data. PB MRD was positive in 26, negative in 86, and inadequate in 6, yielding 95% adequacy and 98% concordance with BM. Using BM as the reference, PB testing demonstrated 96% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 96% positive predictive value, and 99% negative predictive value. Although PB MRD levels were lower than BM (median 0.17% vs 0.84%; P = .002), correlation was significant (r = 0.6; P = .003). Importantly, PB MRD positivity predicted relapse-free survival in the full cohort (P< .01) and postinduction subgroup (P = .0021). These findings demonstrate that PB MFC-MRD testing is feasible, robust, and clinically informative, supporting PB as a promising complementary specimen for MRD assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.