ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Experimental Characterisation of the Anisotropic Behaviour of the Different Tissue Layers of Human Abdominal Wall.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incisional hernias are a common complication after abdominal surgery with an incidence of 5-25% in general population after laparotomy. It is therefore necessary to reduce the potential occurrence of abdominal hernia development. For this, understanding the mechanical behaviour of the different abdominal wall structures is important to develop good predictive models. Unfortunately, very few experimental studies have addressed the different structures of the abdominal wall. To gain a better understanding of their mechanical behaviour, samples were extracted from pigs (for protocol validation) and then from two abdominal human cadavers, with different orientations (vertical, horizontal or oblique) on the different tissues. The mechanical characterization was obtained from quasi-static uniaxial tensile tests. The results showed anisotropic behaviour depending on the location and orientation of the tissue, as well as the type of tissue (muscle, aponeurosis or peritoneum). Inter-individual variability was also demonstrated. This study highlights the heterogeneity of the biomechanical properties of the abdominal wall and provide new values and interpretations to help improve the development of new predictive numerical models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41649776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.