Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649776›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

Experimental Characterisation of the Anisotropic Behaviour of the Different Tissue Layers of Human Abdominal Wall.

Noémie Petit, Martin Boillat, Alice Coudray, Philippe Clavert, Benoit Romain, Daniel George

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noémie PetitUniversity of Strasbourg, CNRS, ICube, Strasbourg, France.
Martin BoillatUniversity of Strasbourg, Institute of Physics and Biology, IRIS Platform, Strasbourg, France.
Alice CoudrayMaxillofacial Surgery Service, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Philippe ClavertInstitut d'Anatomie, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France.
Benoit RomainDepartment of Digestive Surgery, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Daniel GeorgeUniversity of Strasbourg, CNRS, ICube, Strasbourg, France. george@unistra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-8141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incisional hernias are a common complication after abdominal surgery with an incidence of 5-25% in general population after laparotomy. It is therefore necessary to reduce the potential occurrence of abdominal hernia development. For this, understanding the mechanical behaviour of the different abdominal wall structures is important to develop good predictive models. Unfortunately, very few experimental studies have addressed the different structures of the abdominal wall. To gain a better understanding of their mechanical behaviour, samples were extracted from pigs (for protocol validation) and then from two abdominal human cadavers, with different orientations (vertical, horizontal or oblique) on the different tissues. The mechanical characterization was obtained from quasi-static uniaxial tensile tests. The results showed anisotropic behaviour depending on the location and orientation of the tissue, as well as the type of tissue (muscle, aponeurosis or peritoneum). Inter-individual variability was also demonstrated. This study highlights the heterogeneity of the biomechanical properties of the abdominal wall and provide new values and interpretations to help improve the development of new predictive numerical models.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallAponeurosisModels, BiologicalPeritoneumAnimalsAnisotropyBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleSwineTensile StrengthAnisotropyAponeurosisBiomechanicsExperimentsMechanical behaviourMuscle

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.