Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649765›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2026

Couple Resilience Inventory (CRI): Adaptation and Validation in an Italian Sample.

Jaume Grané-Morcillo, Silvia Donato, Miriam Parise, Susana Costa-Ramalho, Carles Pérez-Testor, Berta Vall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaume Grané-MorcilloUniversitat Ramon Llull (URL), Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences (FPCEE), Blanquerna, Couple & Family Research Group (GRPF), Barcelona, Spain. jaumegm@blanquerna.url.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0441-2793
Silvia DonatoFamily Studies and Research University Centre, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (UCSC), Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8406-4604
Miriam PariseFamily Studies and Research University Centre, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (UCSC), Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2150-6636
Susana Costa-RamalhoFaculdade de Ciências Humanas, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-1649
Carles Pérez-TestorUniversitat Ramon Llull (URL), Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences (FPCEE), Blanquerna, Couple & Family Research Group (GRPF), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3037-2062
Berta VallUniversitat Ramon Llull (URL), Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences (FPCEE), Blanquerna, Couple & Family Research Group (GRPF), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6869-6903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Couple resilience is an emerging dyadic construct of growing interest in the scientific literature. Resilience acts as a protective factor against mental illness and psychiatric disorders. The Couple Resilience Inventory is one of the most frequently used scales to assess it. Our purpose was to develop an Italian adaptation and validation of the CRI in the general population, examining its psychometric properties: factor structure, reliability, convergent validity and divergent validity. Participants were 360 individuals (83.9% women) from 19 to 74 years old (M = 34.96; SD = 12.87). Results from confirmatory factor analysis support the bi-factorial structure of the original validation study: positive couple resilience (PCR) and negative couple resilience (NCR). The model tested proved acceptable goodness-of-fit indices (χ

Indexed as

Couple resilienceDyadic copingMental healthRelational resilienceValidation

Identifiers

PMID41649765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.