ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Predicting the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis: a multi-center study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to establish a predictive model to evaluate the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) using preoperative parameters. Clinical data from 580 patients who underwent LCs at three tertiary hospitals between January 2013 and June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Predictors were selected through LASSO and Logistic analyses. Eight machine learning algorithms were used to create prediction models, evaluated by ten-fold cross-validation, ROC curves, DCA, calibration curves, precision-recall curves, confusion matrices, and DeLong’s test. SHAP analysis enhanced model interpretability. The intervals between onset and PTGBD, upper abdominal surgery histories, WBC, gallstones, gallbladder wall thickness, neutrophil percentage (Neut%), and time until PTGBD were identified as predictors. The Naive Bayes (NB) model demonstrated outperformed other models in clinical decision-making and prediction. SHAP analysis identified Neut% as the most critical prediction model feature, followed by the time until surgery after PTGBD. A online calculator was developed using the NB model ( https://zw17786325639.shinyapps.io/difficulty/ ). This study developed and verified a network calculator based on the NB model to predict LC surgical difficulty after PTGBD, aiding surgeons in preoperative risk assessment and timing selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.