Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649720›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2026

Topical mycophenolate for the treatment of uveitis-associated inflammation.

Jyoti Chauhan, Ermanno Gherardi, Hae Lin Jang, Shiladitya Sengupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jyoti ChauhanCenter for Engineered Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 65 Landsdowne Street, 317, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Ermanno GherardiCenter for Engineered Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 65 Landsdowne Street, 317, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Hae Lin JangCenter for Engineered Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 65 Landsdowne Street, 317, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Shiladitya SenguptaCenter for Engineered Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 65 Landsdowne Street, 317, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. ssengupta2@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUveitis refers to the inflammation of the uveal tract of the eye (iris, ciliary body and choroid). In the developed world, it accounts for 10–15% of all cases of blindness. Anterior uveitis accounts is the most common form of uveitis. There is an unmet need for a topically administered non-steroidal drug to treat anterior uveitis.

methodsWe tested two topical formulations of mycophenolate (MPA), an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) enzyme, as a potential steroid-sparing treatment for uveitis. We studied first the binding of MPA to a three-dimensional model of human IMPDH2 generated with AlphaFold 3. Next, we formulated mycophenolate sodium as an aqueous suspension and mycophenolate mofetil as an ointment. Permeability of mycophenolate through the corneal barrier was measured using a Franz cell assay using a goat eye cornea as the membrane. Drug concentration in the different compartments of the eye involved in anterior uveitis was measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Both formulations were tested for acute ocular irritation in vivo, and efficacy in a rabbit model of uveitis.

resultsThe AlphaFold 3 model of IMPDH2 offered a detailed map of the MPA binding site. MPA makes hydrogen bonds to main chain atoms of S276 and G326 and side chain atoms of S276, T333 and Q441 as well as hydrophobic interactions with S276, G415 and Y430. The computational analysis shed new insights on the mechanism of mycophenolate inhibition and allosteric regulation of the enzyme. Mycophenolate was stable over 6 months in both suspension and ointment. Topical application of mycophenolate sodium 1% and 2% suspension eye drop exhibited a drug flux of 81·81ug/cm2 and 140.42 ug/cm2, respectively, through the corneal barrier, greater than 11.01 ug/cm2 and 26.54 ug/cm2 achieved with mycophenolate mofetil 1% and 2% ointments, respectively. The formulations were non-irritant to eyes of New Zealand white rabbits. No systemic clinical signs of toxicity and necropsy findings were observed. Mycophenolate sodium 2% suspension-treated group showed significant reduction (p < 0.0010) in the uveitis score with reduced leukocyte counts in the anterior chamber compared to vehicle control and was not statistically different from positive control prednisone steroid (p = 0.44).

conclusionTopical mycophenolate sodium 2% suspension could emerge as an effective non-steroidal treatment for anterior uveitis and merits clinical evaluation.

Identifiers

PMID41649720
PMCPMC12913868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.