Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649673›Full record

ArticleCrop health2024

How can an in vitro incompatibility of Trichoderma-based products and herbicides impact the parasitism and control of white mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) De Bary)?

Lindomar Canuto da Silva, Amanda Flausino de Faria, Rafaela Araújo Guimarães, Muhammad Siddique Afridi, Flavio Henrique Vasconcelos de Medeiros, Fernanda Carvalho Lopes de Medeiros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crop health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindomar Canuto da SilvaDepartment of Agriculture, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Campus Universitário, CP, MG, 3037, Lavras, 37203-202, Brazil.
Amanda Flausino de FariaDepartment of Plant Pathology, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Campus Universitário, CP, MG, 3037, Lavras, 37203-202, Brazil.
Rafaela Araújo GuimarãesDepartment of Plant Pathology, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Campus Universitário, CP, MG, 3037, Lavras, 37203-202, Brazil.
Muhammad Siddique AfridiDepartment of Plant Pathology, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Campus Universitário, CP, MG, 3037, Lavras, 37203-202, Brazil.
Flavio Henrique Vasconcelos de MedeirosDepartment of Plant Pathology, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Campus Universitário, CP, MG, 3037, Lavras, 37203-202, Brazil.
Fernanda Carvalho Lopes de MedeirosDepartment of Plant Pathology, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Campus Universitário, CP, MG, 3037, Lavras, 37203-202, Brazil. fernandamedeiros@ufla.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of management methods for both diseases and weeds depends on the compatibility between the tools. Biological control represents an important strategy to cope with the integrated management of white mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) through parasitism of sclerotia. However, its application in the field is more cost-effective if combined with the herbicide in a tank mix, as long as the products are compatible. Therefore, we aimed at (i) evaluating two compatibility test methodologies (constant exposure and different times) and (ii) two soybean crop seasons to infer the compatibility of Trichoderma-based products. In vitro bioassays were performed to assess the compatibility between herbicides (Haloxifope-p- methyl, Glyphosate N-ammonium salt, Fluasifope-p-butyl, Fomesafem, Chlorimuron ethyl and Imazapyc + Imazapyr) and two biocontrol agents (Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma harzianum). Thus, the recommended spray volume for each herbicide was added to the PDA culture medium (Potato-Dextrose-Agar) and then deposited in the center of the plate a disc of mycelium from each antagonist isolate (constant exposure). The tests with time of exposure were marked at times 0, 2, 4, 8 and 16 h (simulating tank mixing) and at the spp of each time were plated on PDA medium. For both tests, the mycelial growth and conidiogenesis of Trichoderma spp. were observed. The combination of herbicide and biocontrol was also tested in the field and sclerotia parasitism, white mold incidence and plant yield were assessed in two field trials. The constant exposure of the antagonists to herbicides revealed that no herbicide was compatible with the T. asperellum or T. harzianum. While in test, exposure time exhibited compatibility with either T. asperellum or T. harzianum, within a period of 2 to 8 h. Conclusively, the integration of biocontrol agents with the herbicide imazapique + imazapyr exhibited significant reductions in white mold disease incidence and conidia germination, along with effective parasitism of S. sclerotiorum and even the least compatible herbicide (glyphosate) resulted in significant reduction in the disease incidence and sustained yield when compared to the untreated control. Therefore, the integration of the biocontrol agent for white mold should always be considered, and the tank mixing of it with the herbicide represents a cost-effective alternative for the grower.

Indexed as

CompatibilityGlycine maxGlyphosateS. sclerotiorumTrichoderma sppWhite mold

Identifiers

PMID41649673
PMCPMC12825989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.