Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649654›Full record

ArticleCarbon balance and management2026

Remote sensing analysis of forest fire impacts on ecosystem productivity, greenhouse gas emissions, and fire risk in Pakistan.

Fahad Shahzad, Kaleem Mehmood, Shoaib Ahmad Anees, Muhammad Adnan, Ijlal Haidar, Umarbek Jabbarov, Murodjon Yaxshimuratov, Manuela Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fahad ShahzadPrecision Forestry Key Laboratory of Beijing, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Kaleem MehmoodKey Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, P. R. China. kaleemmehmood55@gmail.com.
Shoaib Ahmad AneesDepartment of Forestry, The University of Agriculture, Dera Ismail Khan, 29050, Pakistan.
Muhammad AdnanState Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China.
Ijlal HaidarInstitute of Forest Science, University of Swat, Main Campus Charbagh 19120, Swat, Pakistan.
Umarbek JabbarovDepartment of "Accounting and business administration", Mamun University, Khiva, Uzbekistan.
Murodjon YaxshimuratovDepartment of Chemistry, Urganch State University, Urgench, Uzbekistan.
Manuela OliveiraDepartment of Mathematics and Center for Research on Mathematics and its Applications, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal. mmo@uevora.pt.

Funding

DecisionES - Decision Support for the Supply of Ecosystem Services under Global Change H2020-MSCA-RISE-2020/101007950Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 343 UIDB/04674/2020 (CIMA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the spatial variability of forest fire intensity, burn indices, ecosystem productivity, and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions in Pakistan from 2001 to 2023. Using satellite-derived burn indices such as SAVI, LST, NMDI, LSWI, NBR, and MSAVI2, the study examines the relationship between forest fires and net primary productivity (NPP) across diverse ecological regions. The analysis reveals that northern Pakistan, particularly Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Gilgit-Baltistan, experiences high fire intensity, resulting in significant reductions in NPP and increased emissions of COx, NOx, and CH₄. Central and southern Pakistan, including the arid regions of Balochistan and Sindh, exhibit lower fire intensity but remain vulnerable due to climate-driven dry conditions. The study also applies the ΔNPP/ΔBurn approach to evaluate how changes in burn indices correspond to shifts in NPP, revealing that small increases in fire intensity can lead to substantial ecosystem productivity loss. Additionally, a comparative analysis of Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost machine learning models for fire prediction found RF to be the more accurate model, achieving 88.0% accuracy and a 93.8% AUC score. These findings underscore the importance of developing region-specific fire management strategies to mitigate the ecological and environmental impacts of wildfires. The study highlights the critical need for improved fire prediction, early warning systems, and long-term monitoring of post-fire ecosystem recovery. By drawing comparisons with global research, this study contributes to understanding the broader implications of forest fires on carbon dynamics and ecosystem productivity, providing valuable insights for future fire management policies in Pakistan.

Indexed as

Burn indicesEcosystem resilienceForest fireGreenhouse gas emissionsMachine learningRemote sensing

Identifiers

PMID41649654
PMCPMC12973728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.