ReviewCrop health2026
Molecular timekeepers: the curious alliance of redox, repair, and protective proteins in preserving seed longevity.
Review in Crop health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intra-Relations of Biochemical Profiles Defining the Germination Potential of Medium-Term Cold-Stored Maize (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seed longevity-the ability of seeds to remain viable over time-is an evolutionary masterpiece, ensuring plant survival across generations and in the face of environmental variability. Desiccation-tolerant (orthodox) seeds, representative of most crop species, possess the ability to survive programmed drying during maturation, thereby entering a metabolically inactive state. This anhydrobiotic state serves to prolong embryo viability and shield against adverse environmental conditions. While programmed drying is essential for seed preservation, it can result in oxidative and macromolecular damage, which is exacerbated by fluctuations in temperature and humidity during storage. Consequently, this cumulative damage to deoxyribonucleic acid, proteins, and cellular structures can jeopardize seed viability if not adequately repaired. Seed longevity is therefore dependent not merely on passive resistance by molecular stabilizers but on an active repair mechanism that is initiated upon rehydration. The interplay between redox homeostasis, damage repair, and cellular protective proteins forms the cornerstone of seed longevity, helping seeds retain their ability to germinate. This review delves into the converging roles of redox homeostasis, repair, and protective proteins in governing the longevity of seeds. By unraveling how these components cooperate and communicate, we gain deeper insights into the natural strategies that seeds employ to delay aging. Exploring the molecular underpinnings of seed longevity offers substantial novel genetic targets for developing crops with improved resistance to evolving climates and provides crucial insights for the conservation of plant germplasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.