Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649645›Full record

ReviewCrop health2026

Molecular timekeepers: the curious alliance of redox, repair, and protective proteins in preserving seed longevity.

Arup Das, Manoj Majee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Crop health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arup DasBRIC-National Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1558-7006
Manoj MajeeBRIC-National Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India. manojmajee@nipgr.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-2951

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board CRG/2023/000072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seed longevity-the ability of seeds to remain viable over time-is an evolutionary masterpiece, ensuring plant survival across generations and in the face of environmental variability. Desiccation-tolerant (orthodox) seeds, representative of most crop species, possess the ability to survive programmed drying during maturation, thereby entering a metabolically inactive state. This anhydrobiotic state serves to prolong embryo viability and shield against adverse environmental conditions. While programmed drying is essential for seed preservation, it can result in oxidative and macromolecular damage, which is exacerbated by fluctuations in temperature and humidity during storage. Consequently, this cumulative damage to deoxyribonucleic acid, proteins, and cellular structures can jeopardize seed viability if not adequately repaired. Seed longevity is therefore dependent not merely on passive resistance by molecular stabilizers but on an active repair mechanism that is initiated upon rehydration. The interplay between redox homeostasis, damage repair, and cellular protective proteins forms the cornerstone of seed longevity, helping seeds retain their ability to germinate. This review delves into the converging roles of redox homeostasis, repair, and protective proteins in governing the longevity of seeds. By unraveling how these components cooperate and communicate, we gain deeper insights into the natural strategies that seeds employ to delay aging. Exploring the molecular underpinnings of seed longevity offers substantial novel genetic targets for developing crops with improved resistance to evolving climates and provides crucial insights for the conservation of plant germplasm.

Indexed as

DNA repairHeat-shock proteinLEA proteinMSROrthodox seedsPIMTSeed longevity

Identifiers

PMID41649645
PMCPMC12858711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.